Re: In other words, no case was ever brought before the Supreme Court.

Flame » in reply to In other words, no case was ever brought before the Supreme Court.

bowser — 4/4/2012 4:22:27 AM (archived)

The Supreme Court had ruled it illegal before Bush and Cheney did it. There was no doubt. It had been decided.

It wasn't as if there were a question. There was none.

Which makes it more egregious.

The whole thread (12 posts)

"Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - TB - 4/3/2012 4:48:15 PM
- Re: "Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - bowser - 4/3/2012 9:55:11 PM
  - Re: "Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - TB - 4/3/2012 10:43:32 PM
    - Re: "Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - bowser - 4/4/2012 1:08:06 AM
      - In other words, no case was ever brought before the Supreme Court. - TB - 4/4/2012 3:13:21 AM
        
        Re: In other words, no case was ever brought before the Supreme Court. - bowser - 4/4/2012 4:22:27 AM
        
        You're really a lot more comfortable back in 2006 than you are in the present day, aren't you? - TB - 4/4/2012 4:51:49 AM
        
        Re: You're really a lot more comfortable back in 2006 than you are in the present day, aren't you? - bowser - 4/4/2012 6:45:50 AM
- Re: "Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - VelociraptorBlade - 4/3/2012 6:57:37 PM
  - It's kind of interesting how "not socialist" is now "radical." - TB - 4/3/2012 7:12:17 PM
    - Re: It's kind of interesting how "not socialist" is now "radical." - bowser - 4/3/2012 9:54:00 PM
- Incidentally... - TB - 4/3/2012 6:07:41 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (12 posts)

Related discussions