HabitableZone

Off Topic » in reply to Female Breasts II

I'll be interested in following this

Having been single for over 30 years now, I have to confess to some experience with this subject. I've had a series of monogamous relationships, and the benefit of learning at the feet, ankles, calves, etc. and so on of more than a few loving and patient women. Some I would have married, some would have married me, and some I would have and they would have but not at the same time.

I prefer women slender and proportionate. Breasts which are too big are not OK. Breasts which are to small are acceptable. What really matters is if I like the woman. After that, my favorite section is whichever I'm engaged with at the moment. That includes all the obvious, as well as attributes such sense of humor or intellect. What's attractive is what's at hand, so to speak.

A woman is a whole body and mind project, with each melding and meshing with the other and mine. It's how well that process works which determines the satisfaction with the process and outcome. That's most of the time.

There are other times, such as in the morning with a tight schedule, when by mutual agreement it is every body for itself. A selfishness takes over and some of the rules take a brief vacation. But that's only after some time and familiarity.

Now, back to the point. I'm not sure how to separate the parts out. They all have their attraction and appeal in their order and I think a certain attitude and light-heartedness can trigger what the physicality by itself can't. What will catch my eye is a smile, ankles, rear, chest and hair, not necessarily in any order.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (4 posts)

Related discussions