Wouldn't solve the entire problem, but neither does cutting school lunches for the poor.
Or is smaller government and lower taxes simply a smoke screen? It's not really smaller government and lower taxes.
Wouldn't it be easier to start with a bloated "defense" department than with kids lunches? Why not start with "defense"? Wouldn't solve the entire problem, but then neither does cutting school lunches.
Tell me - why not start with the defense department?