Except that Hitler manufactured something of an excuse. Hitler wiped out a small village, reprehensible, inexcusable, a war crime and a crime against humanity. Bush wiped out an entire country. Let's talk about that if you'd care to.
I've read about 20 books on the Bush era, more on Hitlers, authors from both sides of the fence, about 30 more than you. (Remember, you "don't need some author to tell you what to think." One of the funniest things I've ever read, and when I challenged you on it you stayed right there. Books are bad.)
Now, those Christians. Wanna talk about them when they get some power. I'll start another thread and bring up Creationism, there's a good one, abortion, death with dignity, and any number of items that Christians and Republicans love to dote on, and some they may not be very good at. Heck, I can go back to the horseback Crusades, not just George Bush's, the Inquisition, the Pilgrims who didn't run from those nasty Christians but did sail.
I'm willing. But then I think it's always interesting to understand the point of view of those who were there. That's usually reading a book, not a blog, reading more than one book with more than one point of view, not 20 blogs with the same point of view. (Who then give you the talking points which get trotted out here.)
Nope, TB, you remind me of a radio which plays whatever it is tuned to by the lord high overseers, Limbaugh et al. Some of us compose and play our own tune, injecting our own common sense, education, intelligence and experience into the equation. We aren't "dittoheads", nor do we march in lockstep with the PARTY leadership.
Discussing with you is like talking back to that radio. But some of us are dumb enough to do it.
Off Topic » in reply to Yeah, that kind of thinking is pretty outlandish isn't it?
Tell me how Bush invading Iraq was different than Hitler invading Czechoslovakia.
The whole thread (11 posts)
- What do you think...
