Could someone explain the "enemy combatant" angle to me?

Tony — 4/23/2013 5:03:41 PM (archived)

I have a hard time trying to rationalize the fine upstanding defenders of the Constitution arguing that Tsarnaev should not be read rights.

This is a serious question, not a snark, because I just don't get it. I can't square this circle.

The whole thread (8 posts)

Could someone explain the "enemy combatant" angle to me? - Tony - 4/23/2013 5:03:41 PM
- The Conservatives are afraid that if the terrorist gets a fair civil trial he may be acquitted. - ER - 4/23/2013 5:29:39 PM
  - Governments are afraid of acquittal... - FrankC - 4/23/2013 9:08:29 PM
    - You have a point. - ER - 4/23/2013 9:41:05 PM
      - on the plus side - Tony - 4/23/2013 11:11:48 PM
        
        They don't have any oil. n/t - ER - 4/23/2013 11:32:22 PM
- Some background - TB - 4/23/2013 5:17:51 PM
  - Thanks for that - Tony - 4/23/2013 11:23:59 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (8 posts)

Related discussions