I haven't followed the situation.
I assumed that the warnings were probably correct. It's a relief to hear things aren't as bad as was predicted. That's good news.
I thought you got pissy about the article for some reason.
Current Events » in reply to That there was little damage spread very much or very far from the locality of the disaster?
I assumed that the warnings were probably correct. It's a relief to hear things aren't as bad as was predicted. That's good news.
I thought you got pissy about the article for some reason.