You might have noticed that we are already operating on the premise that the only possible solution is a government-controlled health care monolith, with just the details to be worked out, such as which godlike beings will occupy the "commissions" that will make decisions for everyone in the country.
We are told that to oppose nationalized health care is to oppose all health care, period.
There are other solutions, but there's no point in even bringing them up in the current environment. It's socialism or nothing, and Obamacare was engineered specifically with that goal in mind. It isn't me saying that, it's multiple Democrats.
Interesting how relying on one among thousands of private companies for health insurance is somehow seen as virtual enslavement, while relying on an inescapable state monopoly for health insurance is not.
Current Events » in reply to I understand but nevertheless
The mistake you keep making is thinking this is about providing medical care.
The whole thread (20 posts)
- One health care solution...
- You will see similar things here if we come under a "Universal Health Care"...
- God help the ones who fall off their roof and break their back trying to reshingle
- I think that's reasonable.
- You will see similar things here if we come under a "Universal Health Care"...