I should have emphasized more strongly that I was talking strictly about optical properties in the abstract, not imperfections or bad figure in the glass, poor quality in general, or mechanical shortcomings with the tube assembly or the mounting (an oft-neglected consideration). The best scope is worthless without a proper mounting.
The traditional example for this is the "department store" telescope, usually advertised with a magnification an order of magnitude higher than theoretically possible for even a flawless objective of that size.
Anyone considering getting into astronomy, or considering buying a gift scope for a child interested in astronomy should contact one of the astronomy groupies here in the Zone for advice. There's at least three that I know of, myself, SteveS and RobVG.
Space/Science » in reply to Your first paragraph might give people the idea that the toy telescopes made of cardboard and plastic...
You're absolutely right.
The whole thread (11 posts)
- Basic optics for amateur telescopes.
- Your first paragraph might give people the idea that the toy telescopes made of cardboard and plastic...
- Thanks ER!
