People with more time, money and access acquiring and reporting more information. That's all.

What if the information is that the US has attacked and killed American troops, Canadian troops, British troops and Australian troops in these attacks? Is that "right"? Does that affect what is "right".

As well as killing thousands of innocent civilians minding their own business in their own countries as the result of illegal acts of war. Does that affect what is "right"?

Not to worry. One does not have to deal with those moral quandries if they don't leary. It is not written in the soil in which our heads are stuck. Safe and smug in their ignorance, they seem to be proud of their means of protecting their lack of information. Gives one pause.

When one learns the price of these attacks, one might question whether they are "right". But if one refuses to acquire information one never has to question whether they are right or not. They are whatever they choose to believe. Regardless of reality, facts, results they can blithely slide through life comfortable in the knowledge that they are good people, always on the side of "right". By their definition, of course, no matter what they have to ignore, block.

Jack Nicholson was correct when he have that impassioned speech - "You (in this case an impersonal "you") can't take the truth."