Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Junocam

I couldn't follow all of that.

But it appears that the spacecraft spin, orbital motion, and planetary rotation are all taken into account to reconstruct the image later, and the image is four-banded (R,G,B and some "methane" frequency (probably in the near IR) which allows some stereoscopic information to be generated as well.

That's quite a bit more sophisticated than the "pushbroom" scanners I'm familiar with from the '70s and '80s, where a rotating mirror whipped the image past a set of CCD sensors, and where the effect of spacecraft motion was subtracted later during data reduction and processing. Back then, only a slight twist had to be removed from the image (by resampling the data) to compensate for the rotation of the earth under the platform.

I presume the resulting imagery will be fully rectified for public consumption (these purely geometrical effects removed and the resulting map flattened out and rubber-sheeted) to give an image that resembles more or less what we think of as a map projection.

Image processing and technology has come a long way since I meddled in it...

I'm appalled at how much I've missed.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (9 posts)

Related discussions