I know him well, and I have an independent correspondence with him outside the Zone, we get along just fine.

But I do believe he reflects some of the points I made in my post above. He is trying to preserve some of Trump's legitimacy by challenging some of our more extreme statements and unwarranted assumptions about Trump. Let's just say I don't agree with Rob's political opinions, but I don't think he's a partisan propagandist, either.

I did not mention Rob at all in my post above, And I have gone on record before to protest when he was treated discourteously and unfairly.

Just think, if we had actually received irrefutable evidence Obama was born in Kenya, or that Hillary had deliberately condemned Americans to die in Benghazi, don't you think we would have covered for them, and made sure all attacks strictly followed the rules of evidence, given the alternative?