Geek Speak » in reply to testing

The whole thread (21 posts)

• testing - Rita Book - 5/10/2017 8:23:51 PM
  • not you again! - Rita Book - 5/10/2017 8:26:31 PM
    • My writing is fine, thanks. - podrock - 5/13/2017 3:54:24 AM
      • I can't see RL's comment... - mcfly - 5/13/2017 1:11:59 PM
        • thanks-yup, that's were it was - Rita Book - 5/13/2017 4:15:36 PM
      • I have no idea what you're talking about. - hank - 5/13/2017 12:17:36 PM
        • Yes, - podrock - 5/13/2017 5:14:46 PM
      • I thought it would be funny... - RL - 5/13/2017 5:45:33 AM
        • I do not see it... and I am logged in - RL - 5/13/2017 3:30:31 PM
          • Submarine wakes - ER - 5/13/2017 5:08:55 PM
            • Re: correctness and classifedness - mcfly - 5/14/2017 2:11:58 AM
              • You have a point. - ER - 5/14/2017 1:33:21 PM
                • Not just rumor - RL - 5/14/2017 3:41:57 PM
                  • After reading through those papers... - ER - 5/14/2017 9:46:38 PM
                  • So, if that is indeed the case... - hank - 5/14/2017 9:17:46 PM
            • Re: Submarine wakes - podrock - 5/13/2017 5:20:29 PM
          • Same here - Rita Book - 5/13/2017 4:15:11 PM
            • will do - RL - 5/13/2017 5:29:49 PM
    • Have your posts edited by professional for best good result, VERY! - Best Writing Services - 5/10/2017 11:19:46 PM
      • approval worked - RL - 5/13/2017 5:33:08 PM
        • Thanks, RL - podrock - 5/13/2017 6:09:15 PM

Related discussions

• Question for TB Geek Speak · 2011-10-22 · 39 replies · archive
• Something weird. Science Fiction · 2015-10-08 · 9 replies · archive
• Current status of solid-state drives Geek Speak · 2011-12-08 · 1 reply · archive
• The second blog post Off Topic · 2011-12-29 · 4 replies · archive
• Notice To Editors: Off Topic · 2011-10-23 · 15 replies · archive