Re: TB, an appeal for intellectual honesty.
Robert, help me understand the rationalizations one can put on continuing mischaracterizations of plain English posts which will both confront the misinterpretations and allow the person to accept and change?
While avoiding implications of "fatal", "flaw" and "bad". I readily accept the need to act as if these are honest misreadings of the posts for there to be a constructive dialogue. And I get to the point where I do not believe there is an interest in "constructive". I get to where it seems their goal is to be ridiculous and then claim victory. How does one confront and allow the person practicing that tactic to save face?
It is identical to the dilemma faced by Obama in dealing with the Republican House.