Heh, heh. Gotcha. There is no evidence you read it yourself. Of course I didn't read a 24 page article you didn't even bother to describe. Who is going to read all that stuff you reference?

"Climate change is nonsense" "here".

"Proof Saddam had WMDs" "here"

"Iran has nuclear devices" "here"

After "here" there is no more information. Many folks have mentioned this before.

I did read their own synopsis of their paper and I did look up the organization.

Which is more than I believe you did. I, for instance, could respond to the article. You couldn't either describe it or respond to the content of my post.

And I stand by my post as being responsive to their paper as described by them.

Arf