Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Re: The Sanger spaceplane

Re: The Sanger spaceplane

Before I stopped paying attention, the X-33's top Mach number was around six. I remember people moaning that X-33 was so slow that the thermal protection system would never heat up enough to provide valid engineering data (X-33 was an engineering demonstrator for Venture Star). X-33 was totally incapable of functioning as an atmospheric skipper like Saenger's WW-II design. My interpretation for this media spin of X-33 as a bomber is it's one last attempt by Lock-Mart to suck more money out of the government tit before tossing the whole works into the trash dumpster.

Gary

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (4 posts)