Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Sad truth why we are NOT going to Mars

One more time...

1) The only way of clearing the back contamination problem is going to be with the use of long range rovers.

2) Lower launch costs (including some foreign exchange factors) have moved such rovers within the commerical realm: a Mars rover could be flown at a profit by a private sector firm selling the images the rover returns from Mars via the internet.

3) Such rovers will require artificially intelligent robotic vision systems.

EP

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (9 posts)