Re: Gaia

Space/Science » in reply to Re: Gaia - agree with Raoul

Re: Gaia

Raoul — 9/23/2001 5:49:07 PM (archived)

Very good reasoning, DA,
Gaia doesn't need to have a "purpose" more than insects on our planet. Maybe life's function (to avoid the wword purpose) is to thrive, expand and this is what helps it remain "alive".

Raoul

The whole thread (17 posts)

'Rare Earths' meets high metallicity in SciAm - DA - 9/21/2001 9:12:41 AM
- Re: 'Rare Earths' meets high metallicity in SciAm - phil - 9/21/2001 1:46:03 PM
  - agree completely (n/t) - DA - 9/22/2001 1:16:56 PM
  - Re: Sciam & Anthropocentrism - Mark Eby - 9/21/2001 2:57:37 PM
    - a real question - Mark Eby - 9/23/2001 9:56:10 AM
    - random walk? - DA - 9/22/2001 1:13:44 PM
      - Re: random walk? - phil - 9/22/2001 1:48:25 PM
        
        Re: shell - Raoul - 9/22/2001 4:27:52 PM
        
        Re: shell & wing - DA - 9/23/2001 7:11:41 PM
        
        Wings - Nick Hoffman - 9/23/2001 5:37:46 PM
        
        Re: Wings - yes, the road not taken - DA - 9/23/2001 5:58:40 PM
        
        Re: Wings - yes, the road not taken - Nick Hoffman - 9/23/2001 6:38:00 PM
        
        Gaia - Mark Eby - 9/23/2001 9:33:24 AM
        
        Re: Gaia - agree with Raoul - DA - 9/23/2001 2:47:59 PM
        
        Re: Gaia - Raoul - 9/23/2001 5:49:07 PM
        
        Re: Gaia - agree with Raoul - Mark Eby - 9/23/2001 3:16:24 PM
        
        Re: The future of life - Raoul Lannoy - 9/23/2001 8:47:38 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (17 posts)