Way Off

Space/Science » in reply to Very bloody likely.

Way Off

Mark Eby — 10/12/2001 12:14:24 PM (archived)

Have have failed to take into account the variation in size mass and composition of potential impactors. You have assumed characteristics of one class apply to all, and you have ignored a massive scientific consensus by people who have taken all this into account.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (17 posts)

Tunguska was a gas explosion. - Skunk - 10/12/2001 1:17:50 PM
- Current Science journal - lj - 10/15/2001 5:18:27 PM
- Not Bloodly Likely, Skunk. - Vince Maglischo - 10/12/2001 3:00:16 PM
  - Re: Not Bloodly Likely, Skunk. - LJ - 10/15/2001 4:42:36 PM
    - Re: Not Bloodly Likely, Skunk. - Vince Maglischo - 10/15/2001 5:47:38 PM
      - Re: Not Bloodly Likely, Skunk. - LJ - 10/15/2001 6:24:02 PM
- Not bloody likely - Larry J - 10/12/2001 1:31:26 PM
  - Very bloody likely. - Skunk - 10/12/2001 1:54:31 PM
    - Lots of space debris explodes in the atmosphere - ebnelson - 10/12/2001 3:14:24 PM
      - Re: Lots of space debris explodes in the atmosphere - Tom Brosz - 10/12/2001 3:20:25 PM
        
        Debris is more generic, that is all - ebnelson - 10/12/2001 3:37:55 PM
        
        Re: Debris is more generic, that is all - Tom Brosz - 10/12/2001 4:27:52 PM
        
        Re: Debris is more generic, that is all - Skunk - 10/12/2001 4:21:45 PM
        
        An object of 100 tonnes, exploding even 5 klicks up, - ebnelson - 10/12/2001 5:26:40 PM
    - Way Off - Mark Eby - 10/12/2001 12:14:24 PM
      - Links? - LJ - 10/15/2001 5:20:40 PM
        
        Re: Links? - Mark Eby - 10/17/2001 3:43:36 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (17 posts)