Re: Why . . . ?

Space/Science » in reply to Re: then there's Guth . . .

Re: Why . . . ?

D. Spires — 5/13/2002 8:54:15 AM (archived)

<... I doubt any technology can create a universe.

It is equally unlikely that a collection of atomic particles, regardless of arrangement, would be capable of composing a dream.

Dan

The whole thread (16 posts)

Physics News Update -- Another Universe . . . - D. Spires - 5/11/2002 2:47:34 PM
- Boggles the mind. - Bowser - 5/11/2002 3:09:46 PM
  - Re: then there's Guth . . . - D. Spires - 5/11/2002 3:28:21 PM
    - Re: then there's Guth . . . - SM - 5/13/2002 8:02:37 AM
      - Re: Why . . . ? - D. Spires - 5/13/2002 8:54:15 AM
        
        Re: Good point. - SM - 5/14/2002 10:43:27 AM
    - do you like our experiment?. (n/t) - progenitors - 5/12/2002 1:45:20 PM
    - Re: then there's Guth . . . - Bowser - 5/11/2002 4:37:45 PM
      - Yeah, I'm kinda disappointed in the Universe, too - Matt Burley - 5/12/2002 7:41:59 PM
        
        Re: And -- what makes you think they're finished . . . ? (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 5/13/2002 2:23:11 PM
        
        Perhaps...they never will be finished - Matt Burley - 5/13/2002 4:08:49 PM
        
        Precisely. n/t (n/t) - Bowser - 5/12/2002 5:30:09 PM
        
        Re: Yeah, I'm kinda disappointed in the Universe, too - Delbert - 5/12/2002 8:51:34 AM
      - Deleting Bowser - Progenitors - 5/12/2002 1:47:04 PM
      - Dang... - Tom Brosz - 5/12/2002 1:03:51 PM
      - Re: then there's the Great Wall...... - Raoul Lannoy - 5/12/2002 8:20:10 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)