Re: Uninformed?

alcaray — 7/19/2002 4:26:17 PM (archived)

It's old news that the "size and scope currently envisioned" is cut down to where it is impossible to achieve its science mission.

However, I take exception to those who claim that ISS is doing *no* science or *insignificant* science. The link I posted gives support to my position.

If I misinterpreted your words, I apologize.

The whole thread (15 posts)

ISS Science - alcaray - 7/18/2002 9:24:48 AM
- is an oxymoron ;-) n/t - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/18/2002 10:17:50 AM
  - That seems to be the (uninformed) perception. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 7/18/2002 10:38:24 AM
    - Uninformed? - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/18/2002 1:30:59 PM
      - Re: Uninformed? - alcaray - 7/19/2002 4:26:17 PM
        
        Re: What's misinterpretted is the humor . . . - D. Spires - 7/19/2002 5:11:16 PM
        
        Re: What's misinterpretted is the humor . . . - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/19/2002 5:29:10 PM
        
        Re: Just wondering . . . - D. Spires - 7/19/2002 5:41:13 PM
        
        Doesn't much matter what we decide the limits of the list should be. - alcaray - 7/19/2002 6:12:17 PM
        
        Re: Just wondering . . . - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/19/2002 10:21:38 AM
        
        Re: Thanx, Alex . . . - D. Spires - 7/19/2002 11:26:39 AM
      - Re: Uninformed? - p - 7/19/2002 1:02:34 PM
        
        What Nick said. (n/t) (n/t) - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/19/2002 4:26:59 PM
        
        what areas of science will be best served by ISS? - Nick Hoffman - 7/19/2002 4:01:02 PM
        
        love that Aussie humor! (n/t) (n/t) - p - 7/19/2002 4:31:23 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (15 posts)