Re: No . . .

Space/Science » in reply to Re: Because it wasn't . . . (n/t)

Re: No . . .

D. Spires — 10/30/2002 7:21:44 PM (archived)

Just the facts.

"Supporting" Mir -- actually paying to completely revamp the leaking, moldy (literally) relic -- was not in NASA's best interests. Russia could not support it alone.

Life's a bitch, and projects die.

Dan

The whole thread (8 posts)

More on Russian rocket explosion - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2002 6:20:40 PM
- Re: More on Russian rocket explosion - R.L. - 10/29/2002 5:57:42 PM
- Why wasn't Mir's demise (subtle) space terrori$m? - SpaceProjects.com - 10/29/2002 3:45:26 PM
  - Re: Because it wasn't . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 10/30/2002 2:43:13 PM
    - Re: Because it wasn't . . . (n/t) - SpaceProjects.com - 10/30/2002 5:45:17 PM
      - Re: No . . . - D. Spires - 10/30/2002 7:21:44 PM
        
        Re: No . . . - SpaceProjects.com - 10/30/2002 7:30:25 PM
        
        Re: NASA this -- NASA that . . . - D. Spires - 10/30/2002 9:13:23 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (8 posts)