Just a little bone to pick with the scientific community......

Every time you hear scientists or science programs discuss the subject of out-worldly life, you hear them discuss the "requirements" for life to exist.
It is said that for life to exist (and this is stated in a definitive nature) there must be water and oxygen...etc.
I must argue that these are the requirements for life AS WE KNOW IT.
Could we live in a sulfuric atmosphere? No.
Why couldn't we? Because we EVOLVED to live in conditions of water and oxygen.
I'm no highly educated man.Indeed i hold nothing more than a G.E.D. I also mean no insult to the intelligence of our world wide scientific communities,but i believe they are wrong in these deductions.
Bacterium is a form of life, simplistic as it may be. Yet it can exist in a vaccum.We cannot.
Still..you have an example already contrary to the known "facts".
It is in my opinion that life exists only because it has evolved to the conditions set forth before it by the planet on which it lives.Life DOES NOT have to have the same conditions as are present on our planet.
Again..no insult intended to any scientific personel..I just wanted to input my view and opinion on this matter.