Re: The Virtual Planetary Laboratory

Space/Science » in reply to Re: The Virtual Planetary Laboratory

Robert E. B. — 12/11/2002 5:45:51 PM (archived)

Looking at their model, I was wondering if they left out any thing. It’ looks like they got all factors in their model, but I can’t help but feel we will have some surprises as we start discovering the real things.

The whole thread (13 posts)

The Virtual Planetary Laboratory - Robert E. B. - 12/11/2002 3:38:30 PM
- how about the disguised inhabited planetary model... - Scott - 12/11/2002 4:30:05 PM
  - Hey, it's one solution to Fermi's Paradox! (n/t) (n/t) - Robert - 12/11/2002 6:17:30 PM
- Re: The Virtual Planetary Laboratory - Ceolin - 12/11/2002 3:46:40 PM
  - Re: The Virtual Planetary Laboratory - Robert E. B. - 12/11/2002 5:45:51 PM
    - aside - RobVG - 12/11/2002 6:45:35 PM
      - Well, there was SimEarth - alcaray - 12/11/2002 7:09:54 PM
        
        Hmm - RobVG - 12/11/2002 7:33:03 PM
        
        I think I saw it... - alcaray - 12/11/2002 8:25:10 PM
        
        Re: Well, there was SimEarth - Robert E. B. - 12/11/2002 7:18:57 PM
        
        By using different starting conditions... - alcaray - 12/11/2002 8:23:43 PM
        
        SimMars - Tom Brosz - 12/11/2002 8:09:53 PM
- Model misses comets, and accretion in general - E.P. Grondine - 12/11/2002 10:09:01 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (13 posts)