I'll reserve absolute judgement until I've seen the source image, but from the video it already seems apparent that these people don't know what they're doing. Many of the images have obviously been enlarged beyond all reason, using a quadratic-blending enlargement algorhythm which will always introduce orthagonal artifacts into any image. Then the linearity of the images is used as proof of artificiality... not convincing at all, methinks.

I'm also rather un-convinced by the way all the "flying saucers" just happen to be caught edge-on (with their edges always aligned perfectly with the horizontal or vertical elements of the CCD). If these were indeed three-dimensional objects, you would expect to see a variety of shapes, as they were photographed from different angles. What you'd get would be an array of ovals with varying aspect ratios, edge-on being one of the least common angles observed.

Now, if there are anomolies showing up on multiple solar observatories -- and especially if they appear to show objects changing the course of their motion, or otherwise behaving in a way that comets and asteroids can't -- then I'd definitely be interested in taking a look at the source images. In the meantime, the only thing that's clear to me is that these guys image-analysis capabilities leave a lot to be desired.

Cheers,

Nathan