<Somewhere off in REB world, Robert answers a challenge that was never made with his resume including HS grades....
I took...bla ba de blah blah blah.....te 80’s and early 90’s.
...but not using the grey matter much lately, eh?
Let's see, you've posted your 'qualifications', expressed that you REALLY REALLY don't think it's a shadow and 'gently' flamed me cause this isn't FLAME and you consider me your lesser.
I'd say all that's required now is something besides stubborness to make your case.
I'm certainly not a MOC expert but I'm capable of enough critical thought to explain this phenomena, dispite you going into a Croc spin with the non-shaded idea.
Ok big man of science, review our little back-n-forth and see who is using geometry and optics to make his case, and who just reiterates his incredulity at violation of the "Universal Law of no shadows at 1:30 argument.
BTW, this idea that you can bully someone with your (pathetic, really...) resume is FLAMING BS. It might work on the HS kids if you get a bright one that you feel the need to suppress, but that shit ain't gonna fly here. It is the last desperate tactic of someone trying to save face when they know (deep down, feel it?) that they're wrong.
Space/Science » in reply to Re: Somebody is mad. (Nick, please feel free to jump in any time.....
Somebody needs to be right....
