Same problem=different day.
It's been going on for decades, if not centuries.
Certainly tax free, and defended at all costs.
CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE
Mutualistic symbiosis: International investment banking relates to
international drug cartels in mutualistic symbiosis resulting in deleterious
byproducts: globalization, terror frame-ups, short-sells, war profiteering,
debt slavery, environmental despoilation,
and more.
Globalization, unregulated international trade and finance generates, breeds
and supports the drug cartels. Soon the two institutions enter a
relationship
of mutualistic symbiosis (see def. below) and together enter a relationship
of parasitic
symbiosis on the rest of mankind -- the WTC/Pentagon hijack-suicide terror
frame-up is a particularly vivid example of this pattern, historical
examples of which
date back at least to the East India Company forcing Indian Opium on China
to extract that country's wealth and health under the direction of merchant
bankers in the City of London.)
symbiosis: living together in intimate association of two dissimilar
organisms, e.g., international investmetn banking and the international drug
cartels
mutualistic symbiosis: symbiosis in which both organisms gain fitness, .eg.,
international investment banking and the international drug cartels
parasitic symbiosis: symbiosis in which one organism gains fitness at some
expense to the other even though the GDP grows at 4 percent during sterile
booms, e.gs., international investment banking and Homo Sapiens (mankind);
international drug trade and Homo Sapiens.
endoksymbiont: a mutualistic symbiont that resides within the cells of its
symbiotic partner, e.g., international investment banking and the
international drug cartels
International investment banking has been coeval (of the same era, epoch),
and coextensive (extending equally in space, time, or scope) since the days
of
the English East India Company forcing Indian opium upon China to extract
that
country's wealth and health (see def. parasitic symbiosis, above) under the
doctrine of " international free trade" being superior to vulgar
nationalism.
Current Events » in reply to Re: Iran Won't Help U.S. . . .
The Reasons Why are Evident
