More on Clinton speech...
An article at the WSJ site (scroll down to "About That Clinton Speech") confirms some suspicions that the speech was not as bad as advertised, not so much seditious as "incoherent." Of course, this is after I and a host of conservatives had already reamed Clinton out. To be fair, the transcript was not available till now (I scoured the Georgetown site for it to no avail earlier) but it isn't a good idea to pump out the Washington Times viewpoint without closer examination any more than one should do with the New York Times.
With a nod to E.P., who made a similar point, it's good to get the source material and judge for yourself.