Re: A note on pacifism

Current Events » in reply to A note on pacifism from somebody who hits people

Tom Brosz — 1/27/2002 8:12:55 PM (archived)

A coward would not stand unarmed in front of a line of armored tanks. A pacifist might. There is a big difference, and all reasonable people know it.

There also comes a time when you need a soldier with a gun to get the job done. There is a place for both of these philosophies in the fight for human rights and dignity, and the fight does not go as well when one of them is missing.

The whole thread (16 posts)

Volunteer Force Accuse YMCA of Promoting Witchcraft . . . - D. Spires - 1/26/2002 9:20:56 AM
- That's hittin' 'em where it really hurts, by golly - Splinx - 1/27/2002 7:07:04 PM
  - s/b...strategic hub of commerce... - Splinx - 1/27/2002 7:11:32 PM
- Harry Potter and the right - Tom Brosz - 1/26/2002 12:32:45 PM
  - This is my county, Tom - Mary Anne - 1/27/2002 4:03:58 PM
    - Cripes, Mary Anne... - Tom Brosz - 1/27/2002 8:25:41 PM
      - Not exactly... - Mary Anne - 1/27/2002 10:05:29 AM
        
        Suggestion: - Tom Brosz - 1/27/2002 12:20:16 PM
    - That's "Legion of Decency". Oops. n/t (n/t) - Mary Anne - 1/27/2002 6:06:56 PM
  - Very well said, Tom. n/t - ebnelson - 1/27/2002 2:32:23 PM
  - A little more on bookburning - Tom Brosz - 1/26/2002 12:42:15 PM
    - A note on pacifism from somebody who hits people - Mary Anne - 1/27/2002 5:26:30 PM
      - Re: A note on pacifism - Tom Brosz - 1/27/2002 8:12:55 PM
      - pacifism from somebody who saw it first hand - FrankC - 1/27/2002 11:44:22 AM
- So... - Marcia - 1/26/2002 9:51:03 AM
  - Re: I was forced to watch it . . . - D. Spires - 1/26/2002 11:01:25 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (16 posts)