>"Let me know when the facts are in -- assuming Mulgrew would recognize one if it smacked him between the eyes."
Even when the facts ARE in, the press won't be reporting much of it. And no matter how much it may LOOK like that, it won't stand up unless taken to court. By then, it will only be for judges eyes, anyone guilty will get off or receive presidential pardons, or it will be classified for "national security" reasons. Note that national security didn't work at all for 9/11. YOU TELL ME why the FBI IGNORED the FAA's pleas about these Arab terrorists in their flight schools.
No wait, let me "guess"....
All good detectives piece together their information and follow clues.
I'm just arming you with the clues.
As for Mulgrew, it's a shame he's gotten out of control. That doesn't mean he can't write....OR think.
>"Researching conspiracy theories is not research-news. It's called crap-reporting."
Pullease can I be your conspiracy theorist? Please?
I promise only to post things that make you THINK.
You can deny, ridicule and throw out my pieces; but as the days, weeks, months and years roll by; you'll see that some of it was true.
Lindy
Crap Reporter
Current Events » in reply to Re: light years, or light headed . . . ?
It's dizzying
