>How long do you think it will take before a nuclear armed Iraq strikes its neighbors, the US or Israel?

This is a mounting problem, but what re-assurance do we have that Russia won't supply them
to preserve their muti-billion dollar investment?
Insanity aside, WMD are supposed to be DETERRENTS.
If he SHOULD use them, he, his family and his country would be a burning cinder in less than an hour.

>How long do you think Saddam will keep his nukes to himself and not share materials and even finished weapons with terrorists to support his agenda?

Ahhh......even more serious threat.
If you were Sadam, wouldn't you have already unloaded most of your stock?
Wouldn't these weapons already be in the hands of terrorists?
Now Pakistan's ISI chief Mahhoud (the Hood) is a real problem in the making.
And there's more here than meets the eye.
I say Pakistan is not our ally, and it's huge intelligence force with access to nuclear everything is our worst enemy.....or one of them.
I am not fully against destroying Saddam, but want everything planned out perfectly.
The earth is full of crazy people armed to the teeth.
Not an easy matter to decide.

As for Hollywood, just cruised through it.
It's the center for the money and marketing and a lot of movie deals go through there.
And I still enjoy a good movie, even if it shows a different perspective.
As for a lawyer suing the English (or French) director, I'd leave that opinion to the family.
You can't speak for them, now can you?