Obviously, I am not enthusiastic about the government picking up the costs of a failure in the private sector.
But a good rule of thumb would be: if the government forces a private industry to deploy a product or take a certain action that exposes the company to liabilities, the government should provide at least some protection.
An example: If the government MANDATES certain vaccines for the citizens, the people who make such vaccines have no choice in the matter, especially if they are a sole source. The government should lend a hand if the company is then sued for the vaccine.
Heck, why shouldn't the government be open to lawsuit for this kind of thing?
Whether the provisions in this bill do this properly is something I don't know.
I notice that no one seems to be bothered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation covering the tails of banks and depositors.
Current Events » in reply to dems playing more games with Homeland Security.
A rule of thumb on government liability protection
The whole thread (15 posts)
- dems playing more games with Homeland Security.
- A rule of thumb on government liability protection
- Furthermore, if you want to know who has been playing games with homeland security...
- "This homeland security bill, the bill the president supported, was 35 pages long. The bill that I've been asked to vote on Monday or Tuesday is 484 pages long, filled with special interest legislati…
- If they succeed, they should rename this legislation...
