Salman Park Airliner

Tom Brosz — 3/14/2003 6:05:42 PM (archived)

Geez, I hope all these links work.

Of course, it is possible that the defectors are lying about this, and Saddam is telling the truth. The Frontline interview points this out, saying the defectors have an axe to grind. Like Saddam doesn't.

Hard, irrefutable evidence? Maybe not. But definitely a trout in the milk.

The Aviation Week article, with pictures below:

(Sorry about the Rush link, but a direct AvWeek link costs money.)

An interview with Kohada.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_031403/content/salman_pak.Par.0001.ImageFile.jpg

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_031403/content/photo_1.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_031403/content/photo_2.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg

Kohada's map of the site:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/art/map.jpg

The whole thread (8 posts)

Salman Park Airliner - Tom Brosz - 3/14/2003 6:05:42 PM
- Looks like it might be a 727 or DC-9 - Larry J - 3/14/2003 7:09:52 PM
  - Most skilled observers have said it is not a 707, but some plane with engines in the tail (which seems to be missing) (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/14/2003 7:16:53 PM
    - Yeah, the wings are too far back for it to be a 707 - Larry J - 3/14/2003 7:26:12 PM
      - Post that again? the lings were broken.... (NT) (n/t) - Davin L. - 3/14/2003 7:27:54 PM
        
        Damn! They worked before when I checked them. - Larry J - 3/14/2003 7:41:24 PM
        
        Re: Damn! They worked before when I checked them. - Davin L - 3/14/2003 8:23:31 PM
- Re: Salman Park Airliner - Tom Brosz - 3/14/2003 4:08:05 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (8 posts)