I'm confused byt the so called experts on this subject
According to this BBC Article, we should be more concerned about the US using non-lethal chemical weapons than we are about the Iraqi's using lethal chemical weapons...
Can anyone understand the logic presented in this article?
The use of Non-deadly chemical weapons by the US would be damaging for generations to come, but Iraq's use of deadly chemical weapons would be easily overcome?
Que the twilight zone music...
Scott