It was a Washington Post piece with the title: "Atlantic Monthly Editor Killed in Iraq
Michael Kelly Was a Columnist for The Washington Post". The whack-job named "Humvee Driver" posted it in the web-board with the subject of "WP Nazi columnist bites the Iraqi dust".

The closest to any "dripping" I can find in the piece is the single passage: "As a columnist, Kelly was a caustic conservative who was merciless in his criticism of Bill Clinton and Al Gore and was generally supportive of President Bush, especially on foreign policy. In 1997, New Republic owner Martin Peretz, a close friend of Gore, fired Kelly as the magazine's editor over his continuing attacks on the Clinton administration." This passage seems to be a relation of fact rather than a negative charactization, as you seem to think?

Since the balance of the piece sings the praises of the journalist, and since it is a WP piece to begin with...