I don't handle poisonous snakes because I've seen and heard what happens to people who do. Over time, not handling poisonous snakes has become innate in my family - no one handles poisonous snakes. Darwinism is operating.
This fellow didn't learn from others not to handle poisonous snakes, as one would expect. His fater died from it, and he continued the practice. And he still bred. Some female found him attractive enough to breed. Darwin is not operating.
Were Darwin true, tempting snakes would be a turn-off for the bearer of the progeny. Most women, I'd presume, would not want to breed with someone who is liable to pass on one of the dumbest, most ridiculous, inane traits known to modern man.
For it's a fool's bet. If you lose, you lose everything. And If you win, you get squat. Zero. Nil.
Leave it to those Christians to thwart Darwin, at their peril.
Flame » in reply to A technical point
Sharpening it a little.
The whole thread (9 posts)
- A good Christian argument against Darwin.
