I wonder if that's going to happen.
Why would Saddam send his supposedly existing WMD's to Syria?
After all, Syria voted for resolution 1441.
Syria didn't feel sympathy for Saddam's regime.
What has Saddam's regime to gain from giving up its WMD's to another country and not use them ?
And if those WMD's were indeed transfered to Syria, how come nobody saw that happening?
Unless of course, this never happened or the amount of WMD's is so small as to be undetectable, but, is it a worldwide threat, then?
And what about after the war?
The US will get all the contracts to rebuild Iraq, the argument being that it sent its soldiers who risked their lives. Good, but then, why is Blair in favor of a UN involvement in that? Didn't the UK also send soldiers there?
If the US wants to dominate part of the world, it's going to cost a lot! At the cost of a manned Mars space program, too.

Raoul