Re: Wackos

Current Events » in reply to Ah, so now we have religious means testing?

Re: Wackos

Tom Brosz — 4/22/2003 6:01:50 PM (archived)

If we started disqualifying people for wacko religious beliefs, there wouldn't be a lot of liberals left in government either. Heck, try and think of a religion that doesn't sound weird when you get into the details.

"Is that a crystal sewn into your pants, or are you just happy to see me?"

- Moonflower

The whole thread (12 posts)

Bush and the Moonies? - LJ - 4/22/2003 5:16:41 PM
- Ah, so now we have religious means testing? - p - 4/22/2003 5:55:51 PM
  - Re: Wackos - Tom Brosz - 4/22/2003 6:01:50 PM
    - Re: Wackos - LJ - 4/22/2003 8:51:41 AM
- And this is a problem, because...? - Tom Brosz - 4/22/2003 5:27:25 PM
  - Can I Field This One? - Perspective - 4/22/2003 7:39:27 PM
  - There is no "flap". And if Clinton had done this, you would have been all over it. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 4/22/2003 6:02:29 PM
    - If Clinton had done it, nobody would have even pointed it out. (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/22/2003 6:04:16 PM
      - Certainly there's no one around here who likes to troll the net for bad things to say about Democrats - alcaray - 4/22/2003 8:59:32 AM
  - Re: And this is a problem, because...? - LJ - 4/22/2003 8:26:19 AM
    - Re: And this is a problem, because...? - Tom Brosz - 4/22/2003 12:12:15 PM
- Ok, I get it.. - Fox - 4/22/2003 12:08:12 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (12 posts)