Is latest stash of barrels chemical weapons?

Tom Brosz — 4/27/2003 6:59:47 PM (archived)

NYT says no, and describes frustration of search teams operating under several handicaps.

Washington Times says yes.

Heck, I'll believe it when Rumsfeld says it at a press conference. Frankly, when they find the real stuff, I doubt it's going to be stacked outside in a dirt berm.

The whole thread (12 posts)

Is latest stash of barrels chemical weapons? - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2003 6:59:47 PM
- When we find the REAL STUFF, it will be in the form - David F Mayer - 4/28/2003 1:45:02 PM
  - After how many days of our own fruitless searching will it become unfashionable to bash UN inspectors for not finding anything? n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 4/28/2003 5:36:12 PM
    - Oh, how about say 200 days n/t (n/t) - gbaikie - 4/28/2003 6:46:30 PM
    - It does not matter. UN inspectors would have never found anything with Saddam hiding and lying to them. - REB - 4/28/2003 5:56:12 PM
      - Unless I misunderstood, Mayer bashed their competence. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 4/28/2003 6:10:06 PM
        
        I suspected the motivations of the inspectors more than their competence. - Tom Brosz - 4/28/2003 3:11:50 PM
        
        Re: I suspected the motivations of the inspectors more than their competence. - alcaray - 4/29/2003 3:26:17 PM
        
        Yes, you understood correctly. Since the head of the UN weapons inspectors (Scott Ritter) was on Saddam's payroll, - David F Mayer - 4/28/2003 12:14:13 PM
        
        So, your answer to my question was...? n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 4/29/2003 3:16:26 PM
    - SOME of us had said the task was impossible under those conditions n/t (n/t) - p - 4/28/2003 5:49:00 PM
- The verdict is still out. That is right, Don, the verdict is still out. - REB - 4/28/2003 11:39:03 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (12 posts)