Re: Conn. Supreme Court: Fetus Is Body Part . . .

Current Events » in reply to Conn. Supreme Court: Fetus Is Body Part . . .

Lee — 5/8/2003 10:02:02 AM (archived)

http://www.justfacts.com/clancy2small.jpg

(this image maybe too graphic for some.)

I don't know if you people remember when this photo came out, but it rattled a lot of people around the world.

The whole thread (10 posts)

Conn. Supreme Court: Fetus Is Body Part . . . - D. Spires - 5/8/2003 7:38:36 PM
- The fetus has separate DNA from it’s mother - REB - 5/9/2003 11:05:33 AM
  - Speaking of DNA - REB - 5/9/2003 6:57:30 PM
  - Re: Yes -- and no . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2003 4:45:46 PM
- Re: Conn. Supreme Court: Fetus Is Body Part . . . - Lee - 5/8/2003 10:02:02 AM
  - Re: Fetus - Tom Brosz - 5/8/2003 3:51:23 PM
    - D'oh! Posted before I read your link. (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/8/2003 3:52:18 PM
  - Re: Dr. Bruner is not a lawyer . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 5/8/2003 10:50:42 AM
    - So much the better. - Lee - 5/9/2003 7:41:16 PM
      - Re: Who's more qualified to discuss human rights . . . ? - D. Spires - 5/9/2003 4:40:17 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (10 posts)