All the trial did was state that Pvt. Iwanowska refused a direct order, which is always punishable. The divining factor will be the sentencing, which I think will likely be light, in view of the mitigation touched upon by the article.
According to proper procedure, a soldier follows orders first, and complains about them later. He/she may even seek council prior to such performance, providing such is readily available, such as standing in the vicinity of the soldier who is tasked.
What is gained with a direct refusal is, of course, perspective. The media gets wind of it, people start talking, and perhaps regulations are bent, possibly even changed. In this case, I doubt it.
Dan
Current Events » in reply to They shot her for refusing anthrax???
re: Of course . . .
