re: there's a space station up there

Space/Science » in reply to re: re: there's a space station up there

Chris Vancil — 6/10/2003 5:50:39 AM (archived)

Right, which is why we need to fix the problems with STS and return to flight, finish the station and at the same time seriously work on a new system which is safer.

--Chris Vancil

The whole thread (12 posts)

Let's go back to space - Raoul - 6/8/2003 5:56:05 PM
- I Agree. But, retire the STS ASAP! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 6/8/2003 10:26:47 PM
  - re:Ok, but it woud have to be replaced...and how long would that take? (n/t) - Raoul - 6/9/2003 8:44:13 AM
    - 5 to 6 years... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 6/9/2003 6:34:14 PM
      - re: also 5 to 6 years of Soyuz flights to ISS...8-O (n/t) - Raoul - 6/9/2003 8:14:54 PM
        
        re: No matter what replaces STS we will have Soyuz flights to ISS. Your point? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 6/9/2003 8:45:20 PM
        
        re: re: there's a space station up there - Raoul - 6/10/2003 5:35:11 AM
        
        re: there's a space station up there - Chris Vancil - 6/10/2003 5:50:39 AM
- re: Let's go back to space - WHAT EVER - 6/8/2003 10:12:26 PM
  - Made out of what? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 6/9/2003 12:29:25 AM
    - Unobtainium of course. (n/t) - Lee - 6/9/2003 4:57:56 AM
- re: Let's go back to space - Jacob Samorodin - 6/8/2003 6:43:06 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (12 posts)