Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Some depressing calculations.

re: Some depressing calculations.

"I have to do a John Cormack on you, gbaikie.
Sorry.

Assuming deep sea-water is just above freezing [274K],
and the GMM of the water molecule is 18.0gm/mole,
the "rule-of-thumb" equation for explosive velocity of the molecules [km/sec] in a vacuum at that given
temperature is c = 0.25[274/18]^1/2.
c = 0.25[15.2]^1/2 = 0.25 [3.8] = 0.95Km/sec.
c = 950m/s

Water-molecules explosively propelled by extreme pressure differences at temperatures just above freezing cannot exceed 1,000 meters/second [2237mph].
The Specific-Impulse works out to (950m/s)/ 9.8m/s^2 =<
100-seconds of impulse, thereabouts.

Sorry to splash cold-water on your concept, gbaikie."

I'm not sure what your point is, but I want to make sure you realize that this doesn't in any way refute how a pipelauncher works. In fact this is unrelate to how a pipelauncher works. There is no doubt in my mind that a pipelauncher would work- for the purpose I've given it- namely to be a launch pad and to add some speed to a rocket.
A pipelauncher is mind numbingly simple- it makes car look extremely complicated and a very unlikely contraption in comparison. A pipelauncher is about as simple as simpliest rocket engine. A rocket engine was originally a doubtful concept, "How can you push against a vacuum", the supposed educated men of the day said. Doubting a pipelauncher could "work" is similar to thinking that steel boats can't float, sailboats will flip over, and that heated gas doesn't expand.

A pipelauncher will be made, as soon as someone who needs a launch pad, knows that a pipelauncher is an option. And then compares the costs of building a pipelauncher to building a static pad. If this person does not have "access" to lots of beach front land (meaning it's basically free) and wants to own (rather than rent) a launch pad, then a Pipelauncher is simply cheaper, faster, and better.
And since I know the Russian pay over 100 million per year to "rent" their crappy launch site. And I've heard of paying 4 million to launch a Delta II from KSC- renting is pretty expensive option even for a single launch- and we won't even go into all hassle those bureaucrats will dish out to the money grubbing capitalists, who dare to think they can go into space.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (12 posts)