They dispensed with the truth a long time ago.

They love to criticise the Bush Administation's war on terror but what has the New York Times done to uncover the terrorists and their network? Why haven't their brilliant reporters found Ossama Bin Ladin or Sadam Hussain? I'm sure they are both just dying to give an interview directly to old grey beast at the heart of the infidel's center of commerce... The NYT hasn't done a damned thing to stop terrorism...In fact, would the NYT do something to stop terrorism if they could? Or would they put their so called "journalistic integrity" in front of saving the lives of innocent Americans, and then sit back and take the easy exclusive.

The truth is that the Times knows nothing that the rest of us don't already know. They report only what is obvious...That which is handed to them...And they are about as reliable as James Carville and dealing spin from about the same perspective...Maybe just a little bit more refined at hiding their bias...heck Carville could be their secret editor-in-chief?

Scott