"http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html";

Is listed as a putative 'flight manifest' for flight 77. It is not, it is a list of the victims. It is not provided by American, but is reported by CNN. I doubt anyone would have been pleased with CNN if they had listed the hijackers as victims.

I see manifests of no other airplanes in the pieces you give us, but I have not read it all (nor, probably will I, as I see already improper claims being made off of improper evidence)

And I assume we are to believe that the multitude of recorded voices from the flight that crashed in PA, and from other airplanes, attesting to middleastern fellows hijacking the plane were all fradulent?

Yes, could be, but why should I accept that supposition?

That there are no arabs on the autopsy lists cited by this fellow means, precisely, that there are no arabs on the autopsy lists cited by this fellow. Nothing more, nothing less. The point being: there are multitudes of explanations for why this could be the case and outside of corroboration I will not choose your/his interpretation, nor place any faith in his account of the 'facts'

"Let that sink in. There were no Arabs on Flight 77."

Let this sink in, Splinx: This proposition is far from proved, or even believable. The majority of evidence from a multitude of sources point to some number of Saudi hijackers flying planes into the WTC, the Pentegon and a small field near pittsburgh. Some buggy or (possibly) misrepresented Autopsy Roster and ONE link to cnn.com which IS misrepresented as a manifest does NOT inject much doubt into matters.

"Either you believe in fairy tales, or you're a conspiracy theorist."

No, one either holds themselves and their thoughts and beliefs aboout the world accountable to reason in all of its modalities and to the best of their abilities, or one lives in a fantasy or 'demon-haunted' world.

Davin L.