What I am angry about is that our incompetent President hasn't caught or killed Mr. Laden yet. Instead of focussing on that essential task he diverted attention and resources towards a reckless adventure in Iraq.

By the way, Mr. Bush still hasn't caught up with Saddam either. I sincerely hope he does so soon - assuming Mr. Bush is capable of doing so. But Mr. Hussein's demise won't make an unnecessary war in Iraq anymore palatable.

Of course, I appreciate the cognitive dissonance you must be feeling right now. Here it is two years after September 11th and Mr. Bush still hasn't caught the man responsible. If he is unable to succeed in doing so until just before the 2004 elections as you suggest, that will only illustrate Mr. Bush's incompetence further.

Now as to your rhetorical question...once again you illustrate what it is the neocons here are good at...flaming other posters rather than discussing the issues. I merely post links to two nationally syndicated articles in this thread and you maliciously twist it to suggest that I somehow sympathize with Mr. Bin Laden. Typical. Perhaps you should be directing your flames to the Associated Press and MSNBC for publishing the news, Scott.