Yes, there's an annual conference of the liberal-democrat party in the UK with the BBC live there.
Apparently, Blair was willing not to invade Iraq had Saddam demonstrated he had no WMD's.

The inspectors added another test: that Saddam should publicly call on Iraqis to cooperate with them. So we constructed this framework: that Saddam should be given a specified time to fulfil all six tests to show full cooperation; that if he did so the inspectors could then set out a forward work programme and that if he failed to do so, action would follow.

Iraq continues to deny it has any WMD, though no serious intelligence service anywhere in the world believes them.

I have never put our justification for action as regime change. We have to act within the terms set out in resolution 1441. That is our legal base.

Speaks volumes!

I wonder how it can prove it's got no weapons if it hasn't got them.

Raoul