re: Unfortunate, but necessary

Current Events » in reply to Unfortunate, but necessary

Tom Brosz — 9/24/2003 11:50:28 PM (archived)

Did any source you found say whether this was to increase the total amount of troops over there, or is it to allow current troops over there to rotate back? I have seen nothing as yet that answers this question, although DOD sources keep insisting the total number of troops they have is sufficient for now.

The whole thread (4 posts)

Unfortunate, but necessary - Don - 9/24/2003 11:44:33 PM
- That's what they said back in the vietnam era. "Send more troops and the war will be over very soon," That went on over a decade with no winners and lots of losers. (n/t) - Jason - 9/25/2003 1:02:29 AM
- re: Unfortunate, but necessary - Tom Brosz - 9/24/2003 11:50:28 PM
  - I suspect... - Don - 9/24/2003 11:55:38 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (4 posts)