Maybe the thread should be about media bias
It should bother people that the major newspaper of a large city is essentially an organ of a specific political party. This story was precisely prepared and timed specifically for maximum impact on the campaign. Spiking a similar story about Davis is just the icing on the top, and nobody is really surprised any more.
As for tolerating Arnold's behavior, I wouldn't know. I'm voting for McClintock. After I vote to kick Davis' bony ass out of office.
The object of the Times attack was to make Republican voters abandon Arnold for McClintock, or other candidates. If Republicans were the moral hypocrites some people say they are, the trick would be useless, wouldn't it?
