I undersatnd what you are saying

Off Topic » in reply to So if someone is killed by the action of another...

FrankC — 10/12/2003 3:30:39 AM (archived)

and I don't really disagree.

The model of motive or consequence may not apply well for every hypothetical but it could probably be applied in a purely clinical perspective to any debate.

It might tend to make one appear a bit amoral in some cases and be accused of being amoral in many more.

The whole thread (9 posts)

Type C and Type M arguments - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2003 4:35:51 PM
- Was exactly what I was trying to point out on Flame earlier........;-) - Tony - 10/8/2003 6:56:13 PM
- re: Type C and Type M arguments - McFly - 10/7/2003 9:58:32 PM
  - Motive vs. consequence - FrankC - 10/9/2003 3:05:35 AM
    - re: Motive vs. consequence - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2003 4:11:28 AM
    - So... the ends justify the means? - Mary Anne - 10/11/2003 3:34:45 AM
      - No - FrankC - 10/11/2003 2:40:11 PM
        
        So if someone is killed by the action of another... - Mary Anne - 10/11/2003 11:05:46 PM
        
        I undersatnd what you are saying - FrankC - 10/12/2003 3:30:39 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (9 posts)