Why can you post so many facts and accurate complete quotes, and yet the other side will ignore them and happily post another out of context quote?
I am convinced that we are seeing a mass social effect where people are allowing themselves to be led around by a few opinion makers who no matter how proven wrong, no matter that they have to ignore what they said they believed just months ago, are finding resonance with the lies and untruths these same people are saying today.
The persistant reliance on non-truths is so similar in some ways to UFO cults that I am very surprised it is gaining such broad popularity. But then for sometime many people did have a sort of low level of tacit buy in to the ufool movement.
The side that supports the war is clearly the side of reason and fact in this, and the opponents, for whatever motive, have really had to train themselves hard to not be able to see anything but bad in this: evil motives of the 'Bush insiders', bad outcomes for the war, bad outcomes for the occupation, bad outcomes for our security.
The lack of evidence in this is now actually evidence for these poeple, just like Fox in the 'X Files'.
Current Events » in reply to Finding out who your real friends are.
The real question is why facts don't sway the spamming opponents?
